l am not talking ratio of summit to death which would be K2 or Annapurna, and l am also not counting volcanic erruptions. Just total deaths of those trying to climb.l know Mont Blanc takes quite a few, but what about Fuji? Mt Washington?

Yo' Mama is Big Toe

For being such a low peak without being extremely far north or south, Mt. Washington does have an unreasonably large number of deaths. l doubt its the highest, maybe not even close, but for less 6500 ft its pretty outrageous. If u go to the webpage below, there is a link at the bottom that gives some info on all the deaths on or very close to Mt. Washington. There is everything from skier is & avalanches in the winter, to falling ice & hypothermia in July, even a murder. l think one of the causes of the high number of deaths is that it is a low lying & easy to climb mountain that is severly underestimated. While mountaineers heading to the Himalaya is generally know their stuff, hikers & skiers on Washington do not anticipate the weather changing as fast or as brutally as it does there.

Everest HANDS DOWN

k2

longs peak in co takes quite a few.

but then so does some of the easier 14ers.but that is by simple number of climbers..Nanga Parbat is probably the worlds most deadly mountain.